John Ioannidis and the Qualitätsrevolution – Nachrichten AG

September 4, 2024, 7:05 PM

Dr. John Ioannidis, an American-American Gesundheitswissenschaftler griechischer Abstammung, who is in the Wissenschaft a Namen power, is the only way he can do this. Seine Arbeit is not nur de Analyze von Daten, sondern fell more das Aufspüren der Qualität und der Verlässlichkeit winstschaftlicher Studies. This Herangehensweise has acquired the title of “Gewissens der Wissenschaft”. At Stanford University, he is co-director of the Innovation Center for Meta-Forschung, which Ioannidis investigates the Integrität of Studies from various fields related to Medicine, Economics, Science and Psychology.

The findings of his investigations are alarming: Ioannidis comes to the conclusion that 80 to 90 percent of the published studies are poorly managed. The seriousness of the fragments with the quality of the erasure is a question of and of the community, the methods and standards in the following thought process. Through the analytical analysis of Herangehens it is so that the reproduction and production power of Erebnissen is no longer suitable. If that is so, then the print, which has arisen through the Wissenschaftler, is not provided with a verlaässlichen Konsens-führen.

Einflussreiche Stimme in der Wissenschaft

In the Fachwelt Ioannidis would be one of the most important scientists in the area of ​​Medicine, Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science. His publications and advances have a great influence on researchers and practitioners, who have other things to do with the validity of their own study. In the letter in which Ioannidis had an important ansprache at a conference in Innsbruck, which for the large expenses. An appeal has been made to science, the quality of research into the seriousness of the matters and the fact that there are no factory towers that have a current or financial interests, can lead to welding work.

Critical analyses of wisdom are intended to bring to attention the complexity and the speed of the Wissens. The developments in the interior of the wisdom community are questionable, and Ioannidis’ work leads to this problem being solved and thus an improvement of the standards is provided, which apply to the establishment of study. It is no longer the integrality of the science of beddeutung, but there are more indications of the common health care that provides the results in the history of wisdom.

Ioannidis’ approach is neither analytical nor proactive. There is a normative cultural renewal in the Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft, a sicherzustellen, the quality and transparency of a first stelle stehen. It is important to know that at a certain time, in the case of data erasure, an informed separation about health and the search for solutions is necessary.

The urgency of Ioannidis’ conflicts could not be greater. In view of the global reforms, with the COVID-19 pandemic and other common interests, the price elimination and the communication scientific will give prominence. If you are in the meta-research souls, so that the foundations also the application scientific result in a strong and improve, the trust in the substances, treatments and health guidelines do not disappear lost geht.