close
close

Successful financing processes: Gründerinnen geben Tipps

Successful financing processes: Gründerinnen geben Tipps

Finanzierungsprozess: Who vale Gespräche muss man führen? Who ermittelt man die Bewertung? Welche Kennzahlen divorced in a B2C business? Die Gründerinnen von Clare&Me messages.

Successful financing processes: Gründerinnen geben Tipps

Celina Messner and Emilia founded the AI-Healthtech Clare&Me and answered questions about the financial round: Who won the long run? Do you have a good metric for investors?
Clare&Me, Adobe Stock, Collage: Gründerszene

For the Australian mental health app Clare&Me, the group of Gründerinnen Celina Messner and Emilia were able to obtain funding to the tune of 3.7 million euros. The Berliner KI-Healthtech has received an expert knowledge of Clare, who uses his smartphone device with nutzern-nutrition and the available therapy therapy. If people experience a mild depression or a milder depression, fewer symptoms will occur.

While the Munich Healthtech investor YZR, who was involved in one of the previous round wars, got the fund of the Teleclinic Mitgründers Reinhard Meier. One of the new investors Antler is again dabei. A new investor has a board, so Kodori Ventures and Material Ventures. Zudem that Clare&Me is located on the Fördermittel of the Entwicklungsbank Berlin (IBB), European Funds and the Federal Ministry for Education and Research.

Let also

Google and Partech invest 7 million: Founder reveals who’s hat was blown

The startup started in February 2022 in a pre-seed round of one million euros, with a big message. There are prominent Business Angels who have developed a startup – Hans Raffauf, founder of the menstruations app Clue and the consulting platform Krisenchat, the Ovavio founder Jenny Saft who sees Inas Nureldin and Michael Schweikart of Fintech Tomorrow.

What was the reason for this but for the success of the financial process? Who has the long-term equipment of the Gründerinnen? Who has made many investments? And what tips are given to others?

Here you will find some details and practical tips for the run: Who would have the Bewertung ermittelt? Well-known people were divorced – and of course: Würden die Gründerinnen beim nächsten Mal etwas differently machen?

Who has endured the process for a long time?

While the Runde lasts about as long as the Metriken, the Pitchdeck, etc. And then it’s been about three months since the Runde is the hat, where it’s always been.

Were those first Schritte? Who planted the Runde?

Because the storyline was described, our USP sin was that many investors and investors would have a board and a list of their power. There is a data room available – and then it will get hotter in the introduction of the investors.

There are many investors who have gotten into trouble?

Man said he had done investment for investment with about 100 investors. I think I spoke to about 150 investors.

Which Tools has had its day, what is the process to organize?

Go to Notion and Excel.

Let also

With the help of Pitchdeck, Wissenschaftler has obtained 8 Millions

Which indicators or metrics mattered most to investors?

There were classic measurements for B2C, with the retention of 12 weeks, the retention of 6 months, the engagement, the Weiterempfehlung, CAC, etc. With a strong retention, the war is still unclear. If Nutzer zu Clare kommen en blijben, sie blijben lang. There is a war going on about what the product is – also Journey, Roadmap and Features – and for all techniques. If you have put the USP on an unknown approach and an unknown technology, this is a moment where you can profit. It will be one of many years with the theme – also for the ChatGPT-Hype – and could be that it was Wissen in the real world. Because there is a lot of knowledge, the best Herangehensweisen experience and the learning experience will have arisen.

Who would deal with the Rückschlägen, if Investors were no longer interested? Does your euro strategy have a long lifespan?

Because we have figured out that we cannot separate, feedback is not possible with our feedback and our feedback is not relevant. If the fund is aware of a fund that has not moved to the right theme, it is not that an internal fund is raised and that no own fund is invested – it is a bag. If we get relevant feedback, it can no longer be that we have a story that is not correct. Or, when we get started with the deck, it may not have been so clear, who is one of our plans – or, if we can no longer use one of the following strategy in the back areas. We cannot expect any excess of our machines – an end to our Nutzer, not for the Investors.

Let also

Concrete Tips, How Longer It Takes With Your Financial Financing

Who has it where a company is located? And who thinks that investors can deal with a different attitude?

There is a Term Sheet with a rating and a parallel discussion with a good rating – the statement is then high on the market. Bei andere Bewertungen, je nachdem. Entweder, we can pronounce and argue the previous decisions of the company, but we can also not be different – or we can use other things that we can find on the basis of the unanswered choices. That is relatively normal.

Looking back, is it a best solution, which is otherwise struck in another way? How were your other founders and founderinnen judged?

If problems arise, investors and investors can express themselves and draen. We have done a few things, such as monetary money matters and the war in a longer process. If you have a problem, this is a problem. Man sollte sich ook immer auch Alternativen anschauen.

Let also

I have been to a Therapy place for 22 weeks – or the AI ​​that Berliner Startups are crazy about