Trump to Drive US Sentiment Policy: Is Fed Power in Trump’s Repurchase in Gefahr? | 17.08.24

h2 class=”h4″>Die wechselhafte Beziehung zischen Politik und Fed

The path of the Federal Reserve in the united war is a longer historical process. The power of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 by the US Secretary of the Treasury and the US Secretary of the Treasury was part of the Führungsgremiums of the Fed. The inflow of the Fed during the political war in the development phase of the US Central Bank is nevertheless unacceptable. How Stephen Slivinski, one of the leaders of the Editor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, organized the “Forbes” party, “exercised Congress and the executive power by merging the Fed with its strong influence”. The members of the Finanzministerium and the Fed were marked in 1951 as a separate Wendepunkt in the Richtung Autonomie. The gilded policy of the Fed is a separate factor for the economy, which will have a political influence on the economy.

Stagflation of the 1970s as abschreckendes Beispiel

Historically, this trend is notorious, a monetary policy instability by hindrance. The “stagflation” – the emerging economies of stagnation and inflation – of the 1970s are one of the main policy instruments of the Fed-Zinspolitik, which are other people who exercise a political influence. The time point of the Fed is under the rule of President Richard Nixon. The Republican took up the fight with the Fed chairmen Arthur Burns, the Geldpolitik in the vault, a Wirtschaft for the Wahlen in 1972. Nixon has taken the pressure on himself: “I respect my independence. I think it is a disbelief that the Schluss comes, that my attention is the right sin”, with “Forbes” from the leaked Nixon-Tonbanden seat.

Nixon’s power over inflation and stagnation in the 1970s, which can occur as “stagflation”. This criticism, which did not change during the oil shock of 1973, could now be seen as the main meaning of Burns’ Nachfolger Paul Volcker in 1979. The so-called “Volcker Shock” with Leitzinsraten of over 20 Percent provides for a number of large investments, which will probably cause high inflation at an effective economic end.

Finance expert Cox warns of political influence on the Fed

Jamie Cox, CEO of Harris Financial Group, is among those who note that Volckers executives note that one of the Fed’s remaining bailouts is. “If it’s used, there are a number of presidents who are now going to have a future that is going to be ruined,” Cox warned. There is concrete that the Fed has been through a political crisis, a quick and necessary divorce to hit: “If the Fed has to hit divorces, it’s going to have to face inflation, it’s going to have to deal with a global pandemic, it’s going to have to die in the low period, but a fragment is imagining and an experience bitten by sparrows.”

Does Trump even dare to accept the Fed-Unabhängigkeit?

Given Trump’s criticism of the Fed’s independence in a steady state, the power of presidents over monetary policy has begun. “The chairman of the Federal Reserve has taken other support measures, the Senate can do better,” says Jamie Cox of the Harris Financial Group. After the Humphrey-Hawkins Full Employment Act of 1974 was outlined, the Fed Congress was published in 1974.

Financial analyst Peter Conti-Brown warned that Fed presidents would be given a rule of law that could increase power through his higher court. Cox has a problem with the financing of the federal government, there is talk of a turbulent enterprise. The one-sided presidential election could strengthen the Fed’s role in judicial oversight of monetary policy stability.

That opinion also seems to be Vice President Kamala Harris. The Democratic presidential candidate of concrete after Trump’s exits by the Fed, it was no longer a matter for the US Nut Bank, so it would be that the president would be selected.

Editorial team financi.at