Pelz: Bundesrat will ban imports at Tierqual

Do you want to find Pelze tierqualerisch? Tierschützer wider distribution of the Bundesrat

The Government will give a single leadership to Pelze forbid. If the first Blick erfüllt is, the initiative is of the Pelzinitiatief. But the initiators are no longer willing to go.

Published today at 7:45 PM

No fur coat from animal quality production in Switzerland? The Bundesrat has found the answers to the question of what he is entitled to.

Photo: Keystone

You can subscribe and make a profit from the previous function.

BotTalk

You can do your work in small quantities and eventually gasify it – or just live there. Millions of Tieren lead for Pelzproducts. For cloak, the Besatz von Kapuzen or Handtaschen. All in the Pelze, who became eingeführt in Switzerland, were qualified with a level of 1.5 million levels.

The organizations want an end. With the Pelzin initiative for the Alliance Animale Suisse, a new statement in the written publication: “The increasingly lonely product is verboten.”

The Bundesrat has found an answer to the “basic support value”, which has commercially legitimate ideas. There is an individual indication of the beschlossing. The plant plants that are in the vernehmlassung are available for sale.

If the Bundesrat has left the federal government of the initiative – and that will not be the case: There will be no more imports and the duration of the restored trade activities, under the trade with the dissolved products.

Not according to Swiss standard

All the same, the Bundesrat will define “tierquälerisch” differently than the initiators. Heavy acceptance of the initiative text is not a definition. The initiators opposed everything, were not the Swiss Standard entspricht. If you look abroad at Pelzfarmen, the Swiss standards can develop, the initiators write on your website. “If you activate a Pelze or Pelz product from Pelzfarmen, there is no problem.” With Pelze’s initiative, all hunting and hunting methods that are not accepted in Switzerland are prohibited.

Obwohl de Definition nicht im Initiativetext steht, geht auch der Bundesrat davon aus, dass the Initiative so interpreted became muss. If you notice a trade law that there is a einfuhrbot treated, it is a Swiss gesetzgebung that is not written in the message of the vernehmlassung. It is worth using the Zoll and Handelsabkommen GATT verses.

Tötung mit Totschlagfallen is erlaubt

The Bundesrat has taken into account that now the production methods are applied at the highest possible level, whereby the standard principles of the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) are applied. This is the reason that the level of Schmerzen and keine Angst lead to soll.

Was he the genoa? The Haltung in Käfigen with Gitterböden is a jewel of the WOAH-Prinzipien-tierquälerisch. Never again die on a day in the Switzerland forbidden Totschlagfallen. The Bundesrat stopped the party, the group voluntarily went to this fallen hinein and then became a larger art dish.

Gemäss dem Gegenvorschlag was der Import von Pelzen nor verboten, als de Tiere met een Solchen Falle Gefangen Wurden. Weitere Beispiele für Unterschiede cann das Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit en Veterinärwesen nicht nennen. A list will appear.

Issue for private import

The initiators are not really good. They will not be able to turn the initiative back on. It is necessary that you make the preparations, nor the things you want to undertake. “If there is a Grausamkeit, it is not right and half-hearted”, said Katharina Büttiker, Initiator and Chair of the Organization Animal Trust. It doesn’t make sense that things should be imported if repairs are prohibited in Switzerland.

Furthermore, the initiators, the Bundesrat, find an investigation for the Einfuhr of Pelzen, the own responsibility in the travel organization that should be carried out. Damit could be the ban unterlaufen worden, says Büttiker. “We demand an absolute verb.”

The Fur Flock Association of Swiss Fur depends on the way the Preliminary Flag of the Bundesrat is treated, as the chairman of Ivan Benjamin on the request. “A ban on animalistic furs is in our own right.” The members of the association rely on the Furmark label, which was approved in 2020. There are no products available that do not contain all Furmark products.

Declaration obligation separated

The Bundesrat has a long import agreement with the Tierschutzgründen. There are statistics on a statement. This is the first years in Kraft paper. But the industry has “connected and enlightened” the mission of the Bundesrat.

The explanations are milder than the masses have been shitting. Therefore, the inner part of Elisabeth Baume-Schneider has become beautiful in April, a word that the Bundesrat writes – “of the Animal Protection Grounds and for the Protection of Public Moral”. With the ‘moral’ value, the commercial law is punished.

The problem can occur in the EU. A verb is the rendering of the Schweiz-gemäss Abkommen mit der EU-entgegen. Roads of a suspension of the citizens’ initiative of the Bundesrat is a great challenge, that in the EU a word is exchanged. There is no EU-verbot, but the Schweizer-verbot has become a trade name. In this autumn an automatic regulation must be implemented.

Newsletter

7 for 7

Catch up on the most important news and the best news of the time.

More Newsletter

Charlotte Walser go to the Bundeshausteam of Redaktion Tamedia in 2021. The PhD student Philosophin appeared in 1995 as Journalist.More info@charlottewalser

Found an error? Report it now.

Related Posts

Music Streaming – Spotify continues to learn “Daylist” here too

Wer zegt / überträgt 3. Liga Fußball on TV and livestream?

The big picture