Harris vs. Trump: A heated duel with disinterested issues

The Donald Trump vs. Kamala Harris debate is a war waged by war, which will continue the political discussions in the US. Both candidates have put their jewelry in the Disaster Light on their backs.

A stronger take-off for Harris

Kamala Harris won the debate itself, but it is a “middle-class child” who freezes and restores a strong bond of the American middle class. You can always become fitter and more dynamic if you are Gegner. The conversation and the big gestures were in the manche moments and it was nervous, while Trump came along in the debate and gave a speech. Besides the war that Harris starts with more energy and structure, while Trump wants to work so much, then he will with his wont scharfen Angriffen aufholte.

Wirtschaft: Harris punktet mit Kompetenz

I am Thema, the Wirtschaft, which Harris puts forward in his Kompetenz-eindrucksvoll een Beweis. If you have founded a large company, there is an American Mittelschicht-wirtschaftliche chance on beets and the economic Spaltung zu kämpfen. Trump is said to have established himself in a populist motto. There is a problem, there are many imports from China, an arbitrage in the US that is taking place and imports are on scaffolding. Harris was happy, these people were willing to let their own efforts be slowed down and the political pressure of economics would continue to grow.

Trump sees high inflation at the heart of the economy and shows that is a president who has no problem solving problems. Although it was a problem with a concrete proposal, which the active herausforderungen of wolle was, I was in the fight against Harris wenger Glaubwürdigkeit verlieh.

Dr. Berthold Kuhn, Political Science, received his doctorate from the University of Leipzig and is a graduate of the FU Berlin. Kuhn works with several universities in Europe and Asia as an expert for sustainable development and international interests and is involved in the EU Commission, international organizations and thinking factories. He worked in Xiamen (Gu. Taiwan) and in Berlin. He is co-author of the books „
“Global Perspectives on Megatrends” (Ibidem, Columbia University Press).

Abduction: emotions and polarization

The theme that plays out is an emotional moment in the debate. Kamala Harris spoke endringlich of the personal American woman and the family, who, due to the young changes in the constitution in some federal states, now have no more access to life-sucking medical treatments. The criticism of Trump who speaks out and says, is not the best way to improve the relationship with women.

Trump responded, Harris as radical darzustellen en beton, that is to say that there is no talk of abbreibungen. Harris countered that in swansy federal states the restrictive abtreibunggesetze of US history apply. Trump says that he has been compensated, that he has no radical influence on his existence and that he can express his own opinion. The ruling is the judgment of the conservative Supreme Court, in June 2022, that the liberal abtreibungsrecht is kippte, as „grote Durchbruch“. But Harris has ended up in that emotional emotional situation, through which the empathetic woman can trace the affected woman.

Ukraine-Krieg: Moral Pflicht versus Trump’s Behauptung

In the Theme Ukraine project, Harris has put into concrete the moral responsibility of the US and its work, which has started Ukraine in its camp against Russian aggression. Trump has joined the Krieg, which did not continue his presidency and had a great political competition in the foreground. Harris has heartache and argumentation, the negotiation of Ukraine is no longer a geopolitical, but also a moral issue. While Trump had a mobilizing power at that time, he found a clear strategy for the new world with Russia and its conflict.

Migration: Trump plays his way to Trump

The migration theme is one of the most striking moments for Donald Trump. It is useless that Harris and the Biden government will make an illegal journey for his or her illegal Haltung. Trump argues that illegal American migrants – especially blacks and Hispanics – take away employment opportunities and let the criminal justice system in the high speeds. That point-widmete is a large part of the statements, that is a loose separation erheld and geschickt usetzte. Harris challenges, Trump as a spalter, who America never agrees, will be used even more later. If you have concrete with your vision of an integrated Präsidentschaft, all Americans and the teachers of the Mittelschicht are in the Mittelpunkt-stelle.

Q: Who won?

Kamala Harris was involved in the debate, but it is not the only peace that the Office of the President of the United States has. Other people in social and economic politics can stop Trump. This argumentation war is often waged and is rejected, in a pure opinion position that is used. The emotional moment in which the theme plays out is one of the many problems that arise in obtaining a relationship. If it is good, Trump when he introduces himself, he is with authoritarian sympathizers of the Führer.

Trump has a war in defense mode, which can focus on the theme migration. If only it is not so that the Wirtschaftsthema is an overloaded program for presentations, it is an important point at the Wählergruppen of the Mittelschicht-precious costs.

In the back of Harris takes place one of the candidacies, which knits and fails, the country of his life. The Trump war was energetic and campfire-like, but there were many arguments that could lead to a hard fight, especially for the gebildete Mittelschicht, which could eventually be overcome. A longer term is with the duration of the presentation and the advocacy and the political life of people is never verprellt.

As we engage in this debate, Wähler’s personal priority looms large – but Harris was able to articulate his speech and political German.