TV debate by Tim Walz and JD Vance: Das Urteil des USA-Experten

The debate between JD Vance and Tim Walz is an excellent example.Image: keystone

Interview

The first and only debate between the two Vizepräsidentschaftscandidates is Geschichte. Historian and US expert Rainer D. Gerste lobs the Auftritt of JD Vance and Tim Walz and power a story with John F. Kennedy.

Follow mir

Was it Ihr Eindruck von der Vizepräsidentschaftsdebatte?
Ronald Gerste: The war is safe and zvilistic. It was still a bet that could quickly lead to: Damage, they are both not the right Candidates, but now for the Number 2 Job Candidates. Van der Persönlichkeit her sin both die like Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.

Is it quiet and the debate that bad?
Now, so Vance as Walz – otherwise as Donald Trump – not the polarizing people. When a debate has been had, one of the first impulses that the man has won is the war. The war was a war for American democracy. Jeder hat versucht, for his part of the optimal herauszuholen, that is jedoch auf one of the following art geschehen.

Is the war not over?
No, both of those types are like that. It is clear that both politics and politics have the power, now that you were sagas, they were all woolen. There are different types of fragments available. If it is a problem, Vance und Walz vom Thema is abwewichen. Then the plötzliche von der Jugend und der Grossmutter would be erzählt, the small money for the heizung-hatte. That’s the part of the show.

Has the debate been won?
Unlike Donald Trump and the History, who wandered around Ohio Katzen and their essence became, neither JD Vance nor Tim Walz is a guider Lapsus unterlaufen. Einmal kam Walz jedoch ins Schlingern, als een signal-angeblichen Aufenthalt in Hong Kong against the Niederschlagung der Demokratiebewegung in China. If the moderator is aware, it is a mistake that has been made. There is a war with a concrete Schwachpunkt. If an Urteil is a must, I would be proud to say: That would be a complete success.

What happens during the Trump-Harris debate is that the Vize candidates cannot find answers to the political reforms.
The result is that Vance and Walz have lost their sense of humor. This could all be possible. The uniqueness of the debate wars is that it is no different than Kamala Harris and Donald Trump respectively. Zielscheibe jewelry is not in Studio, in Gegenteil. Vance and Walz have fun playing ball.

That the present day is a matter of great concern.
This is the case in the US, but also in other democrats in Switzerland, Germany or Great Britain. Both Candidates are busy for this debate, it is clear that they should not have been Blösse in front of a million public. I am satisfied that both moderators are grundsätzlich as they are very good, they are always welcome, wenn Vance and Walz concretely share their thoughts. The war was waged differently during the Trump-Harris debate.

It has happened that Tim Walz is often aware of his message, but JD Vance is not. Who is that?
If all goes well, everything has happened. I can’t help but think of the mumbling in the debate that took place in 1960 between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. How Kennedy did that too, if he read the first message of the day. If the war is about tactics, Nixon will no longer be in permanent power. For peace of mind, there is also good food. There is a special Blick. If the room says in two minutes who is making his gegenüber movement, it is not visually that nice.

Walz hatte tatsächlich eine sehr ausgeprägte Mimik, ihm fielen teilweise fast die Augen aus dem Kopf.
JD Vance is visually more attractive, he is already 20 years younger. There is a statesman who is a statesman. Signal Auftritt, signal Blick in the Chamber, the war is grim. Waltz war nervous, powerful ruckartige movements and hatte teilweise diesen and was unvorteilhaften Ausdruck. Purely optically, JD Vance is well-rounded, and the physiognomy is responsible for its management. Walz was recognized by the emotional ones. That is what was said in the Sprache. The Rhetoric War by JD Vance deutliche besser. Was there gesagt hat, hat gesessen.

Were the Wählerinnen and Wähler from the first debate with the debate?
In the discussion, the debate about the Vizepräsidentschaftscandidates has now started marginally on the Wahlausgang. Daran was not different. Although the war was an overshoot period, the man who enlisted both was a man who could count. Most of the time it doesn’t happen. Great Wählerwanderungen vom another Lager is no longer possible. I think this debate about its function and purpose puts a stop to the discussion. The Art and the Weise, which JD Vance and Tim Walz debated, would show the Vertrauen in the US political process.