El Bilal Touré (19) – VfB Stuttgart – Forum | Page 2

I see that I am in a few YouTube videos, but the data is no longer displayed. If the involvement in the part and the Guirassy has arisen, it is so that they both less verglichen. Many people say that the data is not straight and a few years older, while it was an excellent performance, while the minutes did not yet exist.

At npxG/90 (expected goals on Elfmeter pro 90 minutes) there is a hinter Guirassy (0.31 vs. 0.51), all things that Guirassy on deutlich öfter aufs Tor geschossen (1.98 Touré vs. 2.86 Guirassy ) – we are often brought into good Abschlussinformationen.
Touré brought more blessings with Torschüsse to Tor (41.2% vs. 40.3%), the xG also lasted longer, when there was a more Torschüsse per 90 Minuten bekomenmt, like the autumn war.

His npxG/Shot (also in the Ground the Chancenqualität without Elfmeter) is no longer as good as the von Guirassy (0.15 vs. 0.18), and the combination is not as big as the Chancen, which is neither clear, nor is obtained there is no abnormal situation in the quality of Guirassy with us. Is without video material first interpretations.

Interestingly, it is one of the best bilanz at G-xG-hat, also in the case of a xG-erfüllt. You can question a signaler in the Saison in Reims, where Zahlen is entitled to. In the other Saisons, the idR at the xG is a better Overperformer, that is one of the better Hinweis. Also seems the potential to get a clipping. zmindest kein completter Chancentod ist (with 22 years, wohlgemerkt).

If the Passes are there, there is no problem in the Rule and was tough. At Torschüssen nach Standards it is tough as Guirassy, ​​​​it was a strong performance at Kreieren of torerzeugenden Aktionen (GCA/90 0.35 vs 0.30).

Other experiences or experiences are not with the fiber information either, but my interpretations may have become broader.

Klingt is interesting and very happy