Shell: It’s exciting

The action by the British energy companies Shell lasts a long time with the span in The Hague. When you deal with the tension in the climate protection processes, the energy conzern is formed by the separation of the shelter director. This Urteil can produce a range of other results. What is it? An overview:

Do you want to know what the process is?

2018 was reported by the Dutch environmental protection organization Milieudefensie Shell. The wars in the oil and war zones are still not in a Dutch subdivision, but they are not yet British. The Kläger uses the Konzern virus for climate damage by emitting Treibhaus gas with CO2. Auch Shell must stop the lighting of the Paris climate bowls.

Was entschieden die Richter in erster Instanz?

Initially, the Richter 2021 was right for the Klägern. Shell measured a net 45 percent of CO2 emissions in 2030 in the 2019 report and “part of the burden in the fight against the climate”. And the gilded gilding of the Urteil is no longer for one’s own Unternehmen, but for the Zulieferer and Endabnehmer. There can be no war in which a judge can be hit who can be swerved by climate protection.

What arguments are there against the Klimaschützer?

“Shell is one of the biggest climate changers,” said the director of Milieudefensie, Donald Pols. Nur China, the US, Russia and If emit more CO2. Climbing causes problems for people’s lives and destroys human rights. The complainant stands on the stand while the lighting takes place, the state in the Parisian climate is a state of affairs, also for the outside world. “The punishment of large multinationals is unacceptable,” said Pols.

Had Shell collapsed?

The British energy company is of the Ansicht, that is the Parisian climate bowls that do not provide relief for an external company, Shadow dust is reduced. Not targeted, direction must generally be carried out. You can make a man work a different right than the CO2-disableable blessing machine die verantwortlich machen. Verbraucher entschieden schließlich itself, which energy is useful and who fell.

Shell stopped with the naivety of the previous history, the discourse of Shell dem Klima became intense. If Shell does not want more or more gas, another energy system can refuel in the jump, or autofahrer and other tankers.

Do you want to follow Shell as an insurer?

For Shell, financing of production can take place when oil and gas production or tank sets are possible. Shell warns against negative reports about other companies. Zum Beispiel sei the Fluggesellschaft KLM abhängig vom Kerosin. Flugzeuge müssten am Boden bliben, says Shell.

Was für Folgen erhoffen ich die Umweltschützer?

The complaint has a positive effect on other people. Weltweit is still open to complaints about environmental protection. In the Netherlands, Milieudefensie is one of the strong points of Großbank ING. An organization engaged in creating a dominant position, which will undertake an enterprise and a department for climate protection, will be acquired.

Who’s next?

Verliert Shell, where there is a greater protection for the climatic protection and an ans porno for the world, is the seriousness of the power with the energiewende. Won Shell, where there is a large Niederlage for the Klimaschützer and the best Konzerne, is like the best, but the world is no longer a fossil Brennstoff source. Both days were given a lower status in the Revision, so that they were established in the Netherlands. This paint is no longer visible in the end point.

With material from dpa-AFX