close
close

Formel-1-Liveticker: McLaren muss Baku-Flügeländern

Formel-1-Liveticker: McLaren muss Baku-Flügeländern

13:54 hours

Marko: “Zeitgewinn” by the Flügel

Helmut Marko was there iSky ebenfalls zum McLaren-Flügel in Baku is seized and clarified: “We are one thing, so who has the most Zuschauer auch, in Fernsehen angeschaut. And that was an extreme Verbiegung festzustellen.”

“The Regulations say, that the flow is not so easy, that is the result of the successful development. (…) After all, there is a bag, which is the file. Aber was then in racing, there is another history” , so Marko.

“It is not a natural Grauzone. It is normal (in Regulations), there is no aerodynamic change in the speed of the vehicle. Power also links the man to a different method of applying the rules or to the rules of the air.”

Therefore, for Marko it stands: “There is a word that saves time.”


13:46 hours

Flügel in Singapore nicht im Einsatz

If it still doesn’t work, then the vulnerable flight is not in use this week anyway. The one in Singapore would get with deutlich more Abtrieb and damit with another Heckflügel as in Baku.

In Singapore, the team principals’ press conferences open, with their naturally German ausführlicher messages. This autumn, the McLaren theme has a first priority.

As the horsepower increases, there comes a natural point where they will stop working.


13:41 hours

Flügel nicht grundsätzlich illegal

Important: The Baku Flugel met wenig Abtrieb wurde von der FIA nicht grundsätzlich als illegal eingestuft. A lot is used, but it seems like the element isn’t as stark anymore.

Although this is not the case, it is not forbidden and the aerodynamic part in form 1 can be prevented until the last time.

It seems that this is not the case, it is one of the best art verbingen. And here the man will finally be at McLaren a Verstoß.


13:28 hours

Verstappen punished

This Urteil is the owner of a – and Verstappen-comes not with a warning davon. There is talk of a sham, where the Arbeit zu leisten. Verstappen has used the international sport code and his previous function.

Here is the part in the Word:

“It is the policy of the FIA ​​to ensure that the language used in its public forums, such as press conferences, meets generally accepted standards for all audiences and broadcasts. This applies in particular to statements made by participants in the World Championships and thus role models within and outside the sport.”

“This is clearly stated in the FIA ​​rules and has been emphasised by previous cases
submitted to the Stewards in Formula 1, specifically in Las Vegas in 2023.”

“The stewards have reviewed the transcript of Thursday’s FIA press conference in Singapore and Max Verstappen, driver of car 1, used language to describe his car during the event in Azerbaijan that is generally considered ‘rude, rude’ or may be ‘offensive’ and not considered suitable for broadcast.”

“This is ‘misconduct’ as defined in Article 20 of the International Sporting Code and is a violation of Article 12.2.1.k.”

“The Stewards noted that the language was not directed at any individual or group. When called to the Stewards, the driver explained that the word used was common in the speech he had learned, as English is not his native language.”

“While the Stewards accept that this may be true, it is important that role models learn to be vigilant when speaking in public forums, particularly when they are not under any pressure. Verstappen apologised for his behaviour.”

“The Stewards note that significant fines have been imposed for language that is offensive or targeted at specific groups. This is not the case here. However, given that this issue has been raised before and is well known to competitors, the Stewards have decided to impose a more severe penalty than previously and that Verstappen is ‘obliged to carry out work in the public interest’ (Art. 12.4.1.d of the International Sporting Code), in conjunction with the FIA ​​Secretary General for Sport.”


1:15 PM

Bayer: Situation with Ricciardo “bleibt off”

Is Singapore a newbie for Daniel Ricciardo or not? Peter Bayer is ready Air: “Primärer Fokus ist 2025. And after that, and after that, it was clear that this was the case, it remains to be seen.”

Has man “carried out these shifted Deadlines and discussions in the coming years. A war is a theme in the summer break, when power is over the final of the Fahrerpaarung 2025?”

“Then you have an opinion, one of the more times for both teams”, explained and revealed: “It is a big separation, strategic separation, who we drive.”

“Singapur is definitely a weiterer Meilenstein and will go to Singapore for this last final, a line-up for 2025 and other options for discussion,” Bayer said.

A clear answer is not nice either.


13:01 hours

Comparison trap

I have been trying to help Toto Wolff and Frederic Vasseur for a year. Both women had a great experience during a press conference in Las Vegas and can work with a neglected day.

I can’t wait to have everything here again!


12:51 pm

Max Verstappen survives race

The FIA ​​​​that went over during the attack was the Kampf that started Schimpfworte. Max Verstappen must come to the responsible riders, while he is in the Fahrer-PK “das F-Wort”, which has a self-made hat, which he has used.

There is now a break in the hall and must be at the stewards at 13:00 MESZ. Official Ground:

“Suspected breach of Article 12.2.1.k of the International Sporting Code – language used during the FIA ​​press conference on Thursday.”

Let it happen vermutlich on a warning signal. Mal seen.


12:36 pm

Overview FT1

Message

Result


Photos: F1: Singapore Grand Prix 2024