Gunnar Schupelius: Man braucht more as nur hertere Jugendstrafen | Regional

Berlin – While the CDU and the AfD passed the reform of the criminal law from 14 to 12 years, and the extension of the prison sentence to 18 years.

Zuletzt said the CDU-Federal President Friedrich Merz in an interview with BILD, there is a “überhaupt kein verständnis dafür”, that man goes over the Wahlrecht with 16 spreche, Jugendliche Swiss 18 and 21 years is quickly regularity nach “Jugend criminal law and niece nach criminal law enforcement was enforced. “I find that the solutions will work,” said Merz.

I hate the AfD im Bundestag terms: Criminal law from the age of 12, Erwachsenencriminalrecht ausnahmslos from the age of 18.

All parties encourage the day when the CDU is now the next party. You will always be surprised if you die AfD-Vorstende Weidel deshalb die Äußerungen von Friedrich Merz as “Law-and-order-Getöse”, sieien “halbgar and unglaubwürdig”.

SPD, Grüne, Linke and FDP have done their best to get Criminal Justice Verschärfung and courts of Sozialarbeiter, Jugendhilfe and Präventionsprojekte, which will solve the tiefen Fall in the Kriminalität.

The fact is that in 12 years, children have given the Richter a young experience of being punished. The Entwicklung has been founded: In Berlin, the Zahl der Kriminellen Kinder (under 14 years) has been deutlich gestiegen, from 4549 Tätern 2019 auf 5200 im Jahr 2023.

The Tendenz was founded, the Verbrecher became younger and younger – and she knew, she was. Once you are 14 years old, it no longer matters. It is possible that this is a problem.

Of course a Strafe becomes abstract. If you are addressed as Versuch, the weight of the messages is greater and you can determine their reordering. A punishment paint that was used at that time, the return of the tat throughout the world, was not so important because of the verbrechen. Ohne Strafverfahren bleibt everything in Dunkeln.

However, the man himself also fell for the answers: Children were better taught, that their health and well-being were corrected and sanktioniert, in the Kita and in the School – and of course in Elternhaus. It’s not safe anymore.

The anti-authoritarian group settings in all with variants that allow children to know the boundaries do not intend to pay attention to others.

So go to Beispiel das Mobben A debt to a bigger problem is that no one can and cannot have a problem anymore. The Täter was not rigidly punished, but could be so vertraulichen cooked with the sacrifice charged. So look at the Maßstäbe.

When the limit was reached, it was likely that it was no longer possible. Rules and authorities are stopped and oriented. It is broader and downright unfair if the children first weld themselves and then get 12 hints that Gitter gets woolen.

Gunnar Schupelius hat right? Writing Sie and: [email protected]